USPTO serial 78780199
IN THE NIGHT GARDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IN THE NIGHT GARDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, GB
Iver Heath, Buckinghamshire, GB
Iver Heath, Buckinghamshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Corradino
Elizabeth Corradino Moses & Singer LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer memory hardware; computer peripherals, namely, computer keyboards and computer mice; hard discs for computers; modems; pre-recorded video games on CD-ROM; radios; television sets; telephones; digital video recorders; DVDs featuring pre-recorded live action programming and music for children; laser discs featuring pre-recorded live action programming and music for children; electronic publications, namely, books, coloring books, storybooks, comic books, picture books, magazines and newsletters featuring educational and entertainment materials for children recorded on computer media; audio books, namely, prerecorded cassette tapes, compact discs and video cassette tapes featuring programming and music for children; photocopying machines; computer game cartridges; pre-recorded compact discs featuring programming and music for children; compact discs featuring pre-recorded programming and music for children; audio equipment, namely, personal stereos; video equipment, namely, video cassette recorder, video cameras and camcorders; phonograph records featuring programming and music for children; blank audio tapes; blank audio cassette tapes; blank video tapes; audio and video head-cleaning tapes; cameras; camera flashes; contact lenses; contact lens containers; spectacles; spectacle frames; spectacle cases; sunglasses; cases for sunglasses; chains for spectacles and for sunglasses; cords for spectacles and for sunglasses; compasses; barometers; binoculars; telescopes; microscopes; batteries; microphones; calculators; photographic slide transparencies; weighing scales; fire alarms; bicycle helmets; protective clothing; protective footwear, protective headgear, namely, protective headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAGDOLL WORLDWIDE LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Ragdoll Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Ragdoll Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IN THE NIGHT GARDEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |