Drawing for TWO SONS

USPTO serial 78780326

TWO SONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWO SONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morton Amster, Esq.

MORTON AMSTER ESQ AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041production and distribution of entertainment and educational motion picture films on a wide variety of themes; production and distribution of television programs on a wide variety of themes; production and distribution of film and television documentaries on a wide variety of themes; production of audio and video recordings and laser discs on a wide variety of themes; music productionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 26, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance