USPTO serial 78781115
CLASSIC AMERICAN BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLASSIC AMERICAN BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene L. Flanagan III, Esq.
ARLANA S COHEN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | loose tobacco | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PDMS | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |