USPTO serial 78781152
NITORI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NITORI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sapporo, Hokkaido, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | WOVEN FABRICS; KNITTED FABRICS; FELT AND NON-WOVEN TEXTILE FABRICS; VINYL COATED CLOTH for the use in the manufacture of clothing; RUBBERIZED CLOTH; LEATHER CLOTH; FILTERING MATERIALS OF TEXTILE; TABLE NAPKINS OF TEXTILE; DISH CLOTHS; COASTERS OF CLOTH; MOSQUITO NETS; BED SHEETS; unfitted FUTON covers not of paper AND QUILTS; bed linens and accessories, namely, FUTON AND QUILTS CASES; FUTON TICKS, namely, unstuffed futons; PILLOWCASES; BLANKETS, namely, bed blankets, silk blankets, etc;; Unfitted fabric furniture covers, namely, SEAT COVERS OF TEXTILE; WALL HANGINGS OF TEXTILE; CURTAINS; TABLE CLOTHS, not of paper; SHOP CURTAIN OF CLOTH; TAPESTRY of textile; SHOWER CURTAINS; TOILET SEAT COVERS OF TEXTILE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |