USPTO serial 78781329
MAISON ROUGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MALIK, ATTIYA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAISON ROUGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS R. VIGIL
THOMAS R VIGIL PYLE & PIONTEK221 N LASALLE ST ROOM 2036CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Brandy; Cognac | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |