USPTO serial 78781676
LEGISDISCOVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEORGE, DAHLIA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEGISDISCOVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel N. Calder
Rex A. Donnelly RatnerPrestiaP.O. Box 1596 1007 Orange StreetSuite 1100Wilmington, DE 19899Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting and auditing in the field of information technology systems and computer forensic investigations; Business enquiries and investigations; Business expert evaluations and business reports relating to computer forensic investigations | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 2006 |
| 042 | Conducting computer forensic investigations; Providing electronic discovery services; Litigation support services and legal consultation services; Technical expert evaluations and reports relating to computer forensic investigations | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 2006 |
| 045 | Background investigation and research services | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Discovery, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LEGISDISCOVERY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LEGISDISCOVERY, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named LEGISDISCOVERY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |