Drawing for NEW HEALTH

USPTO serial 78782073

NEW HEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEW HEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Albert J.C. Chang

ALBERT JC CHANG CHANG & COTE LLP19138 E WALNUT DR N STE 100ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA 91748-1432UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003skin care products, namely skin conditioner; breath freshenerACTIVEJan 16, 2003
005Food supplements; vitaminsACTIVEJan 16, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2007PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED—
Sep 12, 2007PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 17, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 30, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance