Drawing for THE ORIGINAL DAMP TRAPPER

USPTO serial 78782129

THE ORIGINAL DAMP TRAPPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3280854Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2007
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ORIGINAL DAMP TRAPPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RONALD T. NAGLE

RONALD T. NAGLE BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL ET AL165 MADISON AVE STE 2000FIRST TENNESSEE BLDGMEMPHIS, TN 38103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Dehumidifiers; Dehumidifiers for household useSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 4, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2007C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Oct 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2007C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Oct 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 6, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 24, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 20, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 20, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance