USPTO serial 78782287
PHENOM 200
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHENOM 200?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileria de Aeronáutica S.A.
San Jose dos Campos, SP 12227-901, BR
Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileria de Aeronáutica S.A.
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileria de Aeronáutica S.A.
San Jose dos Campos, SP 12227-901, BR
Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileria de Aeronáutica S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
MITCHELL H STABBE DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-6800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Executive aircraft, airplanes, aircraft, amphibian airplanes, hydroplanes, airplane ejectable seats, airplane propellers, transporters for moving aircraft. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileria de Aeronáutica S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileria de Aeronáutica S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named PHENOM 200
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |