Drawing for IT NETWORK SOLUTIONS WE MAKE IT HAPPEN

USPTO serial 78782312

IT NETWORK SOLUTIONS WE MAKE IT HAPPEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IT NETWORK SOLUTIONS WE MAKE IT HAPPEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Glazer

MICHAEL GLAZER MICHAEL B GLAZER, ATTORNEY AT LAW PC9241 LBJ FWY STE 119DALLAS, TX 75243-3406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer diagnostic services; Computer project management services; Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Computer services, namely monitoring and reporting on the performance, availability, and errors of websites of others; Computer services, namely monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the websites of others; Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, filtering of unwanted e-mails; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, monitoring the websites of others to improve scalability and performance of websites of others; Computer services, namely, redirecting electronic mail to changed personal electronic address; Computer virus protection services; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problemsACTIVENov 15, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 5, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance