USPTO serial 78782936
USFA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with USFA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Electronic data transmission; Instant messaging services; (Based on Intent to Use) Audio broadcasting; audio teleconferencing; communication by electronic computer terminals; communication by mobile telephone; communication by telegram; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; communications by mobile phones; communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; communications via multinational telecommunication networks; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; e-mail forwarding services; electronic data interchange; electronic delivery of images and photographs via a global computer network; electronic mail services; electronic message sending; electronic message transmission; electronic order transmission for florists; electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals, and messages; information transmission via electronic communications networks; Internet cafe services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to the Internet in a cafe environment; news agencies, namely, the transmission of news items to news reporting organizations; providing e-mail services; providing electronic telecommunication connections; providing facilities and equipment for video conferencing; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of general interest; providing on-line communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; providing remote Internet access; providing telephone conferencing services; provision of access to electronic sites; secure e-mail services; signal transmission for electronic commerce via telecommunication systems and data communication systems; streaming of audio material on the Internet; streaming of video material on the Internet; telecommunication services in the field of providing long distance service with audio advertising for others as a component of the long distance service; telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions; telecommunications by e-mail; transmission of data, sound and images by satellite; transmission of database information via telecommunications networks; transmission of messages over electronic media; transmission of news; transmission of short messages; transmission of sound and vision via satellite or interactive multimedia networks; transmission of sound, picture and data signals; transmission of sound, video and information; video broadcasting; video narrowcasting services; video teleconferencing; video-on-demand transmission services; videotext services; virtual chatrooms established via text messaging; voice chat services; voice mail services; voice over IP services; web conferencing services; web messaging; wireless communications services, namely, transmission of graphics to mobile telephones; wireless digital messaging services; wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimiles, images and informations; wireless facsimile mail services | ACTIVE | Jun 2, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ISIU | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE(NOA)-ITU REQUEST | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | RPUB | NOA CANCELLED; REPUBLICATION REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |