Drawing for FULL DISCLOSURE NY

USPTO serial 78783425

FULL DISCLOSURE NY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPP, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULL DISCLOSURE NY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal Greenfield

167 Nugent StreetNew Hyde Park, NY 11040UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041(Based on Intent to Use) Arranging for ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment events; Arranging of seminars and conferences; Dinner theaters;(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on Use in Commerce) Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties; Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties for the purpose of dating and social introduction for adults;(Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on Intent to Use) Entertainment services, namely, wine tastings; Organization of dancing events; Organization of fashion shows; (Based on Intent to Use) Party planningACTIVEJun 10, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 5, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 5, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 31, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 31, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 6, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 30, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 10, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 18, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 27, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance