Drawing for ZOMARIST

USPTO serial 78784621

ZOMARIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZOMARIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maury M. Tepper, III

Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC3724 Benson DriveRaleigh, NC 27609UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of disorders of the nervous system, the immune system, the cardiovascular system including diabetes, the respiratory system, the musculoskeletal system, the genitourinary system, for the treatment of inflammatory disorders, for use in dermatology, in hematology, oncology, in transplantation, in ophthalmology, for use in the gastroenterological area and in the prevention and treatment of ocular disorders or diseases; antiinfectives, pharmaceutical preparations for treating bacteria-based diseases, antivirals, antibiotics, antifungalsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 3, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 1, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 4, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 3, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 4, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 5, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 22, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 22, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 26, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 26, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 26, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 26, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 26, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2006RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS
May 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 9, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance