USPTO serial 78784811
ATG WISDOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATG WISDOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol H. Peters
CAROL H PETERS MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY & POPEINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Customer relationship management (CRM) computer software, namely computer software for building and managing online retail websites; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network and computer software for e-commerce marketing and electronic mail marketing of the goods and services of others; computer software for managing product and service data for on-line retailers; computer software for use in e-commerce business management and business transactions, namely, software for managing and applying customer data, behaviors, preferences and transactions and for assisting business in customer service and in acquiring and retaining customers; computer software for providing electronic online forums; computer software for electronic communications; and downloadable computer software for all of the aforementioned software and user manuals for all of the aforementioned software sold therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer software related services, namely, computer software consulting services, computer software development services, technical services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems for all of the following software in the fields of customer relationship management (CRM)computer software for building and managing online retail websites, computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network and computer software for e-commerce marketing and electronic mail marketing of the goods arid services of others, computer software for managing product and service data for on-line retailers, computer software for use in e-commerce business management and business transactions, namely, software for and for managing and applying customer data, behaviors, preferences and transactions and for assisting business in customer service and in acquiring and retaining customers, computer software for providing electronic online forums, computer software for electronic communications, and downloadable computer software for all of the aforementioned software | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |