USPTO serial 78785300
PROFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3490388Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2008
- Examiner
- JORDAN, AMEETA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOLON, OH
Solon, OH
Solon, OH
Solon, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi A. Boehlefeld
HEIDI A BOEHLEFELD RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR1621 EUCLID AVE FL 19CLEVELAND, OH 44115-2114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | UNDERWRITING WARRANTY PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF ROOFING SYSTEMS; WARRANTY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROCESSING WARRANTY CLAIMS FOR ROOFING SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 2005 |
| 037 | PROVIDING MAINTENANCE SERVICES, NAMELY, REGULAR MAINTENANCE OF ROOFING SYSTEMS UNDER THE TERMS OF WARRANTY PROGRAMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 12, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIRIDIAN SYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by W.P. Hickman Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by W.P. Hickman Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by W.P. Hickman Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named PROFORMANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |