USPTO serial 78785994
AMERICAN TUNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AMERICAN TUNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bonita, CA, US
Chula Vista, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisel M. Ferguson
Lisel M. Ferguson RIMON PC1655 Fairview Ave., Ste 102Boise, ID 83702United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Tuna fish | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 17, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | โ |
| Mar 29, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 29, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 28, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Aug 28, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Jul 17, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 17, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | โ |
| Mar 31, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Dec 3, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 3, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Nov 15, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | โ |
| Nov 15, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Apr 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Apr 27, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | โ |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Mar 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |