Drawing for PHD

USPTO serial 78786034

PHD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PHD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben D. Tobor

Ben D. Tobor Greenberg Traurig, LLP1000 LouisianaSuite 1800Houston, TX 77002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric hair curling irons, electric hair styling irons, and electric hair straightening ironsABANDONED—
011Hair dryersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 14, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 14, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 15, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 18, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance