USPTO serial 78786164
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, & NE1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cellular telephones, PDAs - personal digital assistants; computers, vehicle navigation systems, consisting of computer software featuring a database of map coordinate and locations, a global positioning satellite receiver, electrical cable and documentation all sold as a unit; computer search engine software, computer application software, downloadable from a global computer communication network, for use in management of a database, for use as a spreadsheet and computer search engine, for word processing, computer aided design (CAD), information retrieval, games and utilities; magnetically encoded credit cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Picture postcards, sheet music, song books; catalogues, magazines, books, pamphlets, booklets, handbooks, prospectuses, printed teaching materials and newspapers, all covering subjects in the fields of telecommunication equipment, PDA-related equipment, telecommunication services, computer-related equipment, computer software, computer services and telecommunication engineering; maps, diaries, mounted and unmounted photographs, greeting cards, credit cards without magnetic encoding, envelopes, almanacs, atlases, blue prints, cardboard sheets, cardboard boxes, comic books, control tokens made of paper, graphic prints, printed plans of telecommunication equipment, PDA-related equipment, computer-related equipment, telecommunication network and computer software; posters | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication by cellular telephones, radio and telephone paging services; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network by computers; providing telecommunications connection to a global computer network by cellular telephones; electronic mail; providing communications value-added network (VAN) services; electronic transmission of data and documents by computer terminals; rental of telephone apparatus, facsimile machines and other telecommunication apparatus and instruments; providing multiple-user access to the computer databases, web sites, home pages and bulletin boards of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing databases with information in the fields of news in the nature of current events and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer rental; rental of computer software; updating of computer software; providing databases with information in the fields of weather, computing and computer software; computer consultancy services; computer programming for others; design of computer networks and telecommunication installations for others; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software for use in management of a database, for use as a spreadsheet and computer search engine, for word processing, computer aided design (CAD), information retrieval game and utility; product testing and product research relating to telecommunication apparatus and instruments, electronic apparatus and instruments, their parts and fittings thereof, namely, cellular telephones, computers and radio pagers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |