USPTO serial 78786173
ACTIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter C. Lando
PETER C. LANDO LOWRIE LANDO ANASTASI, LLPONE MAIN STREETRIVERFRONT OFFICE PARKBOSTON, MA 02142Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Activated carbon namely, reactivatable, granular activated carbon for use in adsorbing contaminants from aqueous systems passing through a bed of activated carbon | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 17, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |