USPTO serial 78786216
THEORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THEORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Goldsmith
AMY B GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE FL 8NEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CARE PRODUCTS FOR THE FACE, BODY, HANDS AND FEET, NAMELY CLEANSING LOTION, CLEANSING BARS, CLEANSING CREAM, OIL-FREE CLEANSING LOTION, OIL-FREE CLEANSING BARS, OIL-FREE CLEANSING CREAM, CLEANSING MILK, ASTRINGENTS, TONER, TONING LOTIONS, FACIAL MASQUES, MAKEUP REMOVAL CREAM, MAKEUP REMOVAL OIL, NIGHT CREAM, OIL-FREE MOISTURIZER, WATER-BASED MOISTURIZERS, FOUNDATION MOISTURIZERS, ANTI-AGING CREAM, ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM, ANTI-WRINKLE SERUM, ANTI-WRINKLE OIL, SUNBLOCK MOISTURIZER, SUNBLOCK CREAM, AFTER-SUN LOTION, SUNTANNING PRODUCTS, SUNLESS TANNING LOTION AND SUNLESS TANNING SPRAY and SUNBURN CREAM, EXFOLIATOR, FACIAL MASKS, BODY POWDERS AND SPRAYS, PERFUMES, COLOGNES, DEODORANTS AND TOILET WATERS, BODY SPLASHES AND MOISTURIZING BODY MISTS, AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS, NAIL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL ENAMEL REMOVER, CUTICLE REMOVER, NAIL BASE COAT, NAIL DRYING PREPARATIONS, NAIL TOP COAT AND NAIL SAVING PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |