USPTO serial 78786249
P PROCIDA TILE WORLD IMPORTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2008
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with P PROCIDA TILE WORLD IMPORTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jupiter, FL
Jupiter, FL
Jupiter, FL
Deer Park, NY
Deer Park, NY
Deer Park, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R Glenn Schroeder
R GLENN SCHROEDER HOFFMANN & BARON LLP6900 JERICHO TURNPIKESYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Ceramic tiles, non-metal glazed color tiles made primarily of clay, porcelain, glass, ceramic or earthenware grout and mortar | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2006 |
| 035 | Retail stores and wholesale distributorships featuring ceramic tiles, non-metal glazed color tiles made primarily of clay, porcelain, glass, ceramic or earthenware grout and mortar, tile adhesives and all other items designed for and used in installation and laying of tile | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cormier, Brett
- Other trademarks owned by Cormier, Brett
- Other trademarks owned by Cormier, Brett
- Other trademarks owned by Procida, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Procida, Frank
- Other trademarks owned by Procida, Frank
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named P PROCIDA TILE WORLD IMPORTERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |