Drawing for 3DX

USPTO serial 78786389

3DX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ULRICH, NANCY G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 3DX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

scott mccollister

Scott A. McCollister FAY SHARPE LLP1228 Euclid AvenueThe Halle Building, 5th FloorCleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028golf clubsACTIVEMar 31, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 17, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 17, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 17, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 14, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 6, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 7, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 16, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 28, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 21, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance