USPTO serial 78786426
CORIOLIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORIOLIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica L. Hepp
Erica L. Hepp ROPES & GRAY LLP1 INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110-2602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Micropumps for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of adhesives, coatings and office supplies; Micropumps for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of wall covering materials and floor covering materials; Micropumps for depositing layers of microscopic drops of liquids, fluids or particles; Micropumps for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of edible decorations onto food items; Micropumps for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of clothing accessories and components; Micropumps for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of medical preparations and biological substances; Micropumps to be used for packaging and in the manufacture of electronic equipment, computers, computer monitors, flat panel displays, computer displays, televisions, and handheld devices; Micropumps for depositing conductive substances and electroluminescent substances | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Printers and parts thereof for domestic, business and commercial applications; Printers and printheads for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of adhesives, coatings and office supplies; Printers and printheads for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of wall covering materials and floor covering materials; Printers and printheads for depositing layers of microscopic drops of liquids, fluids or particles; Printers and printheads for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of edible decorations onto food items; Printers and printheads for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of clothing accessories and components; Printers and printheads for extruding, ejecting or dispensing of medical preparations and biological substances; Printers and printheads to be used for packaging and in the manufacture of electronic equipment, computers, computer monitors, flat panel displays, computer displays, televisions, and handheld devices; Printers and printheads for depositing conductive substances and electroluminescent substances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dimatix, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FUJIFILM DIMATIX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FUJIFILM DIMATIX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CORIOLIS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |