USPTO serial 78786875
EBUDDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EBUDDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Collin A. Rose
COLLIN A ROSE CONLEY ROSE PCPO BOX 3267HOUSTON, TX 77253-3267UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Online, interactive education services, namely, providing courses, one-on-one mentoring, and interactive peer support networks in the fields of health improvement | ACTIVE | Dec 3, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |