USPTO serial 78787667
MORE THAN SKIN DEEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MORE THAN SKIN DEEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Pasadena, CA
South Pasadena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brandon Tesser
BRANDON TESSER TESSER & RUTTENBERG12100 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 220LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-7101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations, Astringents for cosmetic purposes, Bath oils for cosmetic purposes, Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes, Body and beauty care cosmetics, Cosmetic cleansing creams, Cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes, Concealers, Cosmetic creams for skin care, Cosmetic facial blotting papers, Cosmetic oils, Cosmetic pads, Cosmetic pencils, Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal, Cosmetic preparations for body care, Cosmetic preparations against sunburn, Cosmetic preparations for eye lashes, Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth, Cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care, Cosmetic rouges, Cosmetic soaps, Cosmetic suntan lotions, Face creams for cosmetic use, Foams containing cosmetics and sunscreens, Foundations, Nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes, Pencils for cosmetic purposes, Rose oil for cosmetic purposes, shampoos, toners, Wrinkle removing skin care preparations, Wrinkle reduction skin care preparations, Age retardant lotion, Baby lotion, Body lotion, Beauty lotions, Eye lotions, Hand lotions, Face lotions, Lotions for cellulite reduction, Lotions for strengthening the nails, Shaving lotion, Make-up removing lotions; Make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams, Non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin, Skin cleansing lotion, Hair lotions, Styling lotions, Sun tan lotions, Sun care lotions, Sun-block lotions, Toning lotion, for the face, body and hands, Teeth cleaning lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Almond oil for pharmaceutical purposes, Antibacterial pharmaceuticals, Pharmaceutical astringents, Bismuth preparations for pharmaceutical purposes, Dermatological pharmaceutical products, Pharmaceutical preparations for treating skin disorders, Pharmaceutical preparations for use in dermatology, Pharmaceutical products and preparations for chloasma, Pharmaceutical products and preparations for hydrating the skin during pregnancy, Pharmaceutical products and preparations for preventing skin blemishes during pregnancy, Pharmaceutical products and preparations to prevent stretch marks, Pharmaceutical skin lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Martello, Jeannette
- Other trademarks owned by Martello, Jeannette
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MORE THAN SKIN DEEP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |