USPTO serial 78788734
CITY LIBATIONS CL. LOVE LIFE. ONE CITY AT A TIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITY LIBATIONS CL. LOVE LIFE. ONE CITY AT A TIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines and publications showcasing entertainment, nightlife, travel, alcohol, bars, lifestyle and city entertainment locations | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Televison shows and video broadcasts over television, video, sattelite, internet,audio and not limeted to other forms of video media | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 043 | Restaurant and bar services, hotel and nightclub entertainment/restaurants venues, cafes and pubs | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |