Drawing for SUPER .38 AUTOMATIC

USPTO serial 78788859

SUPER .38 AUTOMATIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPER .38 AUTOMATIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Daly

THOMAS J DALY CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013PISTOLS, REVOLVERS AND GUN ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, GUN MAGAZINES, GUN LOADING CLIPS, GUN CASES, GUN CLEANING BRUSHES, AND AMMUNITIONACTIVENov 30, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 2, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance