USPTO serial 78789073
ISF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3860764Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2010
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ISF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rex A. Donnelly
REX A DONNELLY RATNERPRESTIAPO BOX 1596WILMINGTON, DE 19899-1596UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Lidar; Infrared sensors for use on vehicles; safety systems consisting of lidar, infrared sensors, and monitoring and measuring units integrated with steering units, braking systems, door, seat, and sunroof controls, vehicle cruise control, vehicle airbag controllers, vehicle seatbelt pretensioners, and electric engine controls, all sold as a unit for sensing and responding to environmental and safety hazard information; vehicle safety system parts, namely, electric engine controls, door controls, seat controls, sunroof controls, vehicle cruise controls, vehicle airbag controllers, and vehicle seatbelt pretensioners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Safety system parts, namely, braking systems for vehicles and parts thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG
- Other trademarks owned by Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG
- Other trademarks owned by Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named ISF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ISSR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |