Drawing for MIX

USPTO serial 78789381

MIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Seiter

WILLIAM J SEITER SEITER & CO220 26TH ST STE 202SANTA MONICA, CA 90402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043cafes, snack-bars, cafeterias, cocktail lounges, canteen services, catering services for the provision of food and beverages, bakery and banqueting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 9, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 8, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 28, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance