USPTO serial 78789965
ZIPFUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIPFUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jo M. Fairbaim
Jo M. Fairbaim KINNEY & LANGE P.A.312 South Third StreetTHE KINNEY & LANGE BUILDINGMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55412-1002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising and advertisement services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Publishing of electronic publications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | On-line security services, namely, providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE ON-LINE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE ON-LINE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ZIPFUND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |