USPTO serial 78791354
JIMMY JUICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with JIMMY JUICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GROSSE POINT PARK, MI
DETROIT, MI
DETROIT, MI
DETROIT, MI
Detroit, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Falkowski
Christopher J. Falkowski Falkowski PLLCPO Box 650Novi, MI 48376-0650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Energy drinks; Flavored waters; Fruit beverages; Fruit drinks; [ Fruit flavored soft drinks; Fruit juice bases; Fruit juice concentrates; Fruit-based soft drinks flavored with tea; ] Fruit-flavored beverages; Fruit-flavored drinks; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; Non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; [ Soft drinks; Soft drinks flavored with tea; ] Sports drinks; Whey beverages | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RCD HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FUNCTIONAL BRANDS
- Other trademarks owned by FUNCTIONAL BRANDS
- Other trademarks owned by FUNCTIONAL BRANDS
- Other trademarks owned by RCD Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named JIMMY JUICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 12, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 15, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |