USPTO serial 78791722
NPAWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NPAWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer software for MANAGING ADMINISTRATIVE AND SERVICE OPERATIONS OF NON-PUBLIC AGENCIES, NAMELY, INTAKE AND ENROLLMENT OF CLIENTS, AND MANAGEMENT OF CLIENT INFORMATION, INDIVIDUAL EDUCATION PLANS, SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES AND TREATMENT, MEDICAL HISTORY, SERVICE SCHEDULES, SERVICES, AND ATTENDANCE RECORDS, FOR THE PURPOSE OF AUTOMATING AND ELECTRONICALLY DELIVERING ENROLMENT RECORDS, SERVICE RECORDS, AND INVOICES TO PRIVATE, PUBLIC, AND GOVERNMENT FUNDING SOURCES | ACTIVE | Dec 13, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |