USPTO serial 78791731
SUGAR PRINCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUGAR PRINCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Carpinteria, CA
Carpinteria, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah M. Lodge
DEBORAH M. LODGE PATTON BOGGS LLP2550 M ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1350UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty products, namely, bubble bath; body soap; hair shampoos; hair conditioners; lip gloss; bath gel; body, hand, facial and foot lotions; body scrubs; facial masks; and kits containing combinations of the above all sold as a unit | ABANDONED | Sep 6, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |