USPTO serial 78791822
BITCHES IN STITCHES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BITCHES IN STITCHES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dale C. Hunt
1049 EL MONTE AVE. UNIT C #122C/O SPAGOLDMT. VIEW, CA 94040Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's, and children's clothing, namely shirts, T-shirts, tank tops, pants, sweatpants, yoga pants, shorts, jackets, bathrobes, skirts, jeans, dresses, gowns, blouses, camisoles, halter tops, underwear, swimwear, sweaters, trousers, suits, raincoats, overcoats, lounge wear, coats, trousers, jerseys, turtlenecks, pajamas, undergarments, lingerie, socks; headwear; footwear; accessories, namely belts, scarves, ties, aprons, gloves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Debra Hagedon
- Other trademarks owned by Herbert, Cyndi
- Other trademarks owned by Herbert, Cyndi
- Other trademarks owned by Hagedon, Debra
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BITCHES IN STITCHES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |