USPTO serial 78791867
INDIGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDIGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Akana K. J. Ma
Akana K.J. Ma Ater Wynne LLP1331 NW Lovejoy St., Suite 900PORTLAND, OR 97209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cards with integrated circuits; Computer software for the design of graphical user interfaces for use with flat-panel monitors, projectors, digital televisions, and other advanced display products; computer software for assisting engineers to design and develop prototypes for advanced display applications, and to debug and configure advanced display applications;computer software for the processing, performance enhancement, and optimization of video, computer graphics, and Web information on a wide variety of display media; computer software for assisting engineers in the design of production display products that use liquid crystal display (LCD), liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS), polysilicon, plasma, cathode ray tube (CRT), and digital light processing technologies; computer software for use as device drivers in the formats of high definition television (HDTV), standard definition television (SDTV), digital Red-Green-Blue (RGB), analog Red-Green-Blue (RGB), and video TV; Integrated circuit modules; Integrated circuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |