USPTO serial 78792151
MAXIGLOSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3482270Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2008
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXIGLOSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Distinctive Cosmetic Ingredients
South Clinton Ave., NM
Distinctive Cosmetic Ingredients
South Clinton Ave., NM
Distinctive Cosmetic Ingredients
South Clinton Ave., NM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian Scott
Ian Scott Cozen O'Connor277 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10172UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for use in the manufacture of cosmetics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 20, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Distinctive Cosmetic Ingredients
- Other trademarks owned by Distinctive Cosmetic Ingredients
- Other trademarks owned by Distinctive Cosmetic Ingredients
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named MAXIGLOSS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |