USPTO serial 78792902
STARPOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STARPOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MARCHWOOD, SOUTHAMPTON, GB
Stanelco RF Technologies Limited
Southampton, Hampshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H Holt
WILLIAM H HOLT LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM H HOLT12311 HARBOR DRWOODBRIDGE, VA 22192-2224UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC MATERIAL IN THE FORM OF POWDER, GRANULES OR PELLETS; BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC MATERIAL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | COMPACT DISC CASES; VIDEO CASSETTE CASES; AUDIOCASSETTE CASES; LENS CASES; SPECTACLES CASES; ALL MADE OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC MATERIALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | FILMS AND SHEETS OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC MATERIAL FOR PACKAGING OR WRAPPING | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | FILMS AND SHEETS OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC MATERIAL FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN WRAPPING OR PACKAGING; FILMS AND SHEETS OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC MATERIAL FOR USE IN THERMOFORMING PROCESSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | ARTICLES MADE OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC MATERIAL BY INJECTION MOULDING, EXTRUSION OR THERMOFORMING, NAMELY, BINS, BOXES, CLIPS FOR CABLES, CLIPS FOR PIPES, CASINGS, COFFIN HANDLES, CURTAIN HOOKS, DECORATIONS, DECORATIVE PLAQUES, DECORATIVE EDGING STRIPS, DISPLAY BOARDS, DOORS FOR FURNITURE, DUCTING, EGG TRAYS, GARDEN FURNITURE, HANDLES FOR GARDEN TOOLS, KEY FOBS, INSERTS FOR TOOLBOXES, TUBS, WALL PLUGS, PLASTIC PULLEYS FOR BLINDS, STORAGE RACKS, PROTECTIVE SHIELDS FOR SHRUBS, SHELVES, STAIR RODS, EDGE-PROTECTING STRIPS FOR FURNITURE, TRAFFIC CONES, GOLF TEES, AND PLANT SUPPORT STAKES | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD ARTICLES MADE OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC MATERIAL, NAMELY, CUPS, DISHES, PLATES, HOUSEHOLD CONTAINERS, PLANT CONTAINERS, TABLE CUTLERY, UTENSILS, TRAYS, ALL MADE OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC MATERIAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | BIODEGRADABLE BAGS AND SACKS; BIODEGRADABLE FIBERS FOR TEXTILE USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BIODEGRADABLE NON-WOVEN FABRICS FOR USE IN MANUFACTURING; BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC FILMS FOR USE IN MANUFACTURING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STANELCO PLC
- Other trademarks owned by Stanelco RF Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named STARPOL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |