USPTO serial 78793429
FARMPURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FARMPURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scot A. Duvall
SCOT A DUVALL MIDDLETON REUTLINGER2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TWR401 S 4TH AVELOUISVILLE, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Flours, namely, white, whole wheat, all purpose, stone grounds, pastry, cake, spelt, kamut, barley, oat, rye, pea, lentil, amaranth, rice, semolina, clears, grits, bran, wheat and durum flakes, meal, crushed or cracked, buckwheat, corn, millet, soya, rice, grains; processed grain products namely milled grains, groats, steel cuts and flakes, grain extracts and grain intermediates or constituents for human consumption | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed and processed specialty grains, namely, wheat, durum, oats, barley, buckwheat, corn, millet, soya, rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail stores featuring malted and non-malted beverages, sorting, sizing, bagging, containerizing, packaging of food mixtures and food ingredients; packaging feed products to the order and specification of others; retail and wholesale stores featuring agricultural products, namely, agricultural seeds for cereal, oilseed and pulse field crops, seed treatments and other crop inputs; business management services, namely, operation of a network of dealers who are engaged in the retail or wholesale sale of agricultural products, namely, agricultural seeds for cereal, oilseed and pulse field crops, seed treatments and other crop inputs | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Milling, blending, and mixing of seed products, food mixtures and food ingredients of others; grinding and mixing of feed products of others; beverage manufacturing services, namely, the production of malted and non-malted beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Farmpure Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named FARMPURE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |