Drawing for LA LIP ENHANCEMENT

USPTO serial 78794018

LA LIP ENHANCEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA LIP ENHANCEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Konrad K. Gatien

Konrad Gatien Stubbs Alderton & Markiles LLP1453 3rd Street Promenade Suite 310Santa Monica, CA 90401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Cosmetic and plastic surgery, namely lipo-augmentation of lipsACTIVESep 5, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 28, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 27, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance