USPTO serial 78794539
DARGOLTZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3464203Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2008
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DARGOLTZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Miami Beach, FL
North Miami Beach, FL
North Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francisco Ferreiro (a member of the Bar of the State of Florida)
Francisco Ferreiro (a member of the Bar of the Sta Malloy & Malloy, P.L.2800 S.W. THIRD AVENUEMIAMI, FL 33129-2317UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stephanie Tires Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Stephanie Tires Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Stephanie Tires Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DARGOLTZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |