Drawing for TOUR CADDIE

USPTO serial 78795167

TOUR CADDIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOUR CADDIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Devon W. Ryning

PAUL L HAVEL MILLER NASH LLP601 UNION ST STE 4400SEATTLE, WA 98101-2352UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic satellite tracking and information system comprising hardware used to determine distances on golf courses and for accessing relevant data and statistics pertinent thereto mounted on a golf cartACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 3, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance