USPTO serial 78795468
COMFORT HEIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMFORT HEIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley L. Cohn
BRADLEY L COHN PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DRSTE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lavatories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |