USPTO serial 78795743
PEEKABOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEEKABOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lloyd L. Zickert
LLOYD L. ZICKERT ZICKERT LAW OFFICE79 WEST MONROE STREETSUITE 1100CHICAGO, IL 60603-4917Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, instructional manuals on the subject of dance and exercise, a series of fiction books, magazines featuring adult entertainment; photographic products in the nature of photograph mounts, stands, albums; photographs; printed music in sheet and book form; calendars, posters, writing pads, writing paper, notepaper, stickers, heat transfer paper; gift stationery; wrapping paper; decorated paper carrier bags and cardboard boxes; paper gift tags; writing instruments, pencils, pens, paint brushes; paintings framed and unframed; handkerchiefs of paper; table linen of paper; table mats of paper; table napkins of paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |