USPTO serial 78796043
AEGEAN HARVEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEGEAN HARVEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
JOSEPH V MYERS III SEYFARTH SHAW LLP1545 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 700ATLANTA, GA 30309-7021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dips, not including salsa and other sauces used as dips; appetizers, namely, croquettes and fried cheese; spreads, namely, yogurt with cucumber and eggplant and mint; salad dressing; entrees, namely hummus, baba ganouge ( a dish consisting of smoked eggplant blended with tahini, lemon juice, garlic, olive oil), tahini, falafel and marinated eggplant, grape leaves, rosemary chicken, smoked salmon, lasagna, mousaka; processed artichokes, processed olives, processed eggplant, processed giant beans, processed mushrooms, caviar, carp roe, fruit jams and preserves, pickled onions, maraschino cherries, cocktail onions; olive oils; mixed vegetables, namely processed lupini beans, sundried tomatoes and tomato products, namely, and tomato paste; processed green and red peppers | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Vinegar, wine vinegar, spices, namely, oregano, parsley, basil, onion, garlic, pignolia, rosemary, thyme, vanilla flavoring not an oil, honey and fillo, flavor extracts, coffee, tea, tiropita, namely, cheese pies, spanakopita, namely, spinach pies, Greek pastries, namely, kataifi, baklava and halvah; a sandwich made of pita bread and vegetables; entrees, namely tabbouleh, lasagna, quiche, rice, and Mediterranean phyllo; Capers; pasta products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |