USPTO serial 78796445
DIVIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3365703Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2008
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIVIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deena R. Merlen
DEENA R MERLEN REAVIS PARENT LEHRER LLP41 MADISON AVE 41ST FLRNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting services in the field of records management, namely, cataloguing, searching, indexing and retrieving documents, photographs and audio and video records; Business consultation services in the field of knowledge management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2005 |
| 039 | Storage of electronic media, namely, images, text, video and audio data; storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data; consulting services in the field of the storage and archiving of electronic media, namely, images, text and audio data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2005 |
| 040 | Physical conversion services, namely, transferring analog video tape to digital video files; cross-platform conversion of analog video tape to digital video files; consulting services in the field of converting analog video tape to digital video files; consulting services in the field of the preservation and conservation of photographic images, documents, and audio and video media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2005 |
| 042 | Document data transfer from one computer format to another; cross-platform conversion of digital content into other forms of digital content; digital migration services, namely, data conversion of computer program data or information; computer consultation in the design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and application software for others in the field of knowledge management, namely, the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, cataloguing, transmission, storage, sharing and retrieval of images, text, audio and video data and information, and for creating searchable databases of information and data, and for searching and retrieving information from digitally archived data; computer consultation in the design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and application software for others in the field of knowledge management, namely, using computer application software and computer hardware for digital migration, conversion of analog video tape to digital video files, cataloguing, encoding, archiving, preservation, storage, reporting and retrieval of images, text, audio and video; computer consultation in the design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and application software for others in the field of knowledge management, namely, using computer application software and computer hardware for taking, encoding, cataloguing and archiving video depositions converted to digital content; computer consultation in the field of computer security of electronic data, documents, audio and video; database development services in the field of the storage and preservation of digital files | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Horse Digital LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Horse Digital LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Horse Digital LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIVIZE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |