Drawing for LEGIONARIES CORY'S QUEST

USPTO serial 78796447

LEGIONARIES CORY'S QUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGIONARIES CORY'S QUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Action type target games; balloons; basketball game set containing basketball hoop, net, and basketball; board games; bubble making activity toys consisting of bubble making wand and solution sets; children's fishing kits consisting of plastic box, plastic worms, hooks and string for fishing; coin operated arcade type video games; coin operated pinball games; decorative wind socks; elbow pads for athletic use; costume masks; hand held unit for playing electronic games; inflatable toys; kites; toy vehicles; party favors in the nature of small toys; plastic inflated balls; piñatas; play sets for use with toy action figures; punching toys; puzzles; ride-on toys; skateboards; snow boards; snow sleds for recreational use; sports balls; stuffed toys; toy action figures; toy building blocks capable of interconnection; toy boxes; toy figures; toy whistles; water squirting toys; yo-yo's; play craft sets consisting of toy modeling dough and a toy modeling knife; and play mats for use with toy vehicles and play mats containing infant toysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 31, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 26, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance