USPTO serial 78796491
MCTI BY FAROUDJA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MCTI BY FAROUDJA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
Molly Buck Richard Richard Law Group8411 Preston Road, Suite 890Dallas, TX 75225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AUDIO AND VIDEO EQUIPMENT AND PARTS, FITTINGS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, NAMELY, DVD (DIGITAL VIDEO DISC) PLAYERS; DVD (DIGITAL VIDEO DISC) RECORDERS; SET-TOP BOXES, DIGITAL TELEVISION SETS THAT INCLUDE LCD (LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS), CRT(CATHODE RAY TUBES), PDP (PLASMA DISPLAY PANELS), LCOS (LIQUID CRYSTAL ON SILICON), DIGITAL LIGHT PROCESSING; FRONT PROJECTION DISPLAYS THAT INCLUDE DIGITAL LIGHT PROCESSING, CRT(CATHODE RAY TUBES), LCD (LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS), AND DILA (DIGITAL DIRECT DRIVE LIGHT AMPLIFIERS); VIDEO PROJECTORS; VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSORS; VIDEO SIGNAL ENHANCERS, VIDEO FORMAT CONVERTERS; SOFTWARE FOR VIDEO PROCESSING, IMAGE ENHANCING AND FORMAT CONVERTING FOR PAL AND NTSC STANDARD TELEVISION, HIGH DEFINITION TELEVISION, AND DIGITAL TELEVISION; COMPUTER VIDEO APPLICATIONS, NAMELY ADVERTISING VIDEO DISPLAY SCREENS; MILITARY VIDEO DISPLAY SCREENS; AEROSPACE COCKPIT VIDEO DISPLAY SCREENS; VIDEO DISPLAYS INCORPORATED INTO EYEGLASSES, VIDEO DISPLAY SCREENS, NAMELY, VIDEO SIGNAGE FOR USE IN AIRPORTS, VIDEO CONFERENCING DISPLAY SCREENS, MEDICAL DISPLAY SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF STAND ALONE VIDEO DISPLAY SCREENS, AND CELLULAR PHONE DISPLAY SCREENS; VIDEO REAR PROJECTION SYSTEMS; VIDEO SCREENS; INTEGRATED CABINETS FOR AUDIO AND VIDEO EQUIPMENT; TELEVISION DISPLAYS; COMPUTER MONITORS; SCAN CONVERTER BOXES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 28, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |