USPTO serial 78796971
DIVE OLLY DIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2010
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DIVE OLLY DIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WOODLAND HILLS, CA
WOODLAND HILLS, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Mike Young Productions Limited
Wales, GB
Mike Young Productions Limited
Wales, GB
Mike Young Productions Limited
Wales, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carlo F. Van den Bosch
Carlo F. Van den Bosch Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP650 Town Center Drive10th FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded video cassettes, digital video discs all featuring animated cartoons for education and entertainment of children; and video recordings featuring a series of children's programs; computer products, namely, children's educational computer software for courses of instruction in subjects at the preschool and elementary school level and children's computer game software all featuring animated cartoons and characters from motion picture films incorporating music, video, animation, and interactive components; sunglasses | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MOONSCOOP ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SPLASH ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BANC OF CALIFORNIA
- Other trademarks owned by Mike Young Productions Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Mike Young Productions Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Mike Young Productions Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIVE OLLY DIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 18, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 18, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 3, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |