Drawing for RADIUS

USPTO serial 78797031

RADIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

Julie Dalke Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Dr, 20th floorCosta Mesa, CA 92626UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Research services in the fields of pharmaceuticals and medicinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 1, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 18, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 28, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 27, 2009EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Jul 8, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 13, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 6, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 7, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Oct 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 28, 2008GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2008GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 7, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 5, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 3, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance