USPTO serial 78797195
Serial No. 78797195
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78797195?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, men's, women's, and children's t-shirts, shirts, tops, sweatshirts, sweatpants, pants, side zip pants, shorts, trousers, jeans, vests, parkas, anoraks, coats, jackets, wind-resistant jackets, jacket hoods, pullovers, sweaters, coveralls, underwear, thermal underwear, boxer briefs, sleepwear, lingerie, loungewear, hosiery, socks, tights, gloves, mittens, shells, one-piece shell suits, ski wear, ski suits, ski vests, ski jackets, ski bibs, bib overalls, bib pants, snowboard wear, snow pants, snow suits, rain wear, rain jackets, rain pants, gaiters, namely, neck gaiters, leg gaiters and ankle gaiters; skirts, skorts, dresses, swimsuits, swim trunks; footwear, namely, athletic shoes (sneakers), trail running shoes, climbing shoes, hiking shoes, slippers, climbing slippers, boots, trekking boots, hiking boots, snowshoes, clogs, sandals; headgear, namely, caps, hats, headbands, bandanas, scarves, earbands, earmuffs, balaclavas, visors, beanies; belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |